10分钟英语演讲稿(2)

i’m li dawei from class 9, grade 2. it is my great honour to share my viewpoints on culture smart and science intelligence with all of dear audience present.
 
as is known to us all that our contemporary lives and the society in current are undergoing profound changes with the promoting development of science and technology. however, have we realized the estrange and departure of our culture against the background on which the positive achievements have been brought by science and technology. which course should we take in culture smart and science intelligence as the issue on social development is concerned in the process of ultrahigh-speeded urbanization? my viewpoint is clear an firm, that is the cultue smart.
 
it is generally accepted by the broad mass that science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. no achievements nurtured by civilization in our contemporary society can be created without the development of science and technology and the society will fall to its stagnant pace. thanks to the progress made by the advancing science and technology, especially the development of intelligentization, schemed out by robots, unmanned driving and digital platform, offers great convienience to both the production and daily lives of human beings and promotes the social progress.
 #p#副标题#e#
but under no circumstances should we admit that a series of problems on environment and social ethics concerning environment pollution, ozonocavity, greenhouse effect, colon human and nuclear deterrent occurred against the prosperity carried out by science and technology. so how can we spare no effort on keeping such problems from deterioration in all possibilities? what development pattern will be on science and technology in future?
 
the answer is that we need the guidance of culture smart. when we talk about culture, we may regard it as the tradition and history, but how can the intelligentization of science and technology be guided by the culture smart? here i want to put it that culture is not like a pond filled with stagnant water, but a dynamic system. we can never draw a conclusion of culture as “the deposit of history”, what’s more, we should make it clear that the culture defines our present and future. modernization, of any kind or shape, shares no alteration on its starting point but the commencement of culture. if not the modernization will inevitably fall to the situation where the water has no source and the tree has no root. the development of science and technology takes no exception on this.
 
the ultrahigh speed of the development of contemporary science and technology contributes no efforts on science and technology itself, but the ideological motivation and the promotion spurred by the ideological power offerd by culture smart. karl poopper once said, the elimination of culture leads to the disappearance of civilization. it is obviously that if the promotion effect had been omitted, the science and technology could have been far-reached.